Ottawa Charge teammates Emma Greco and Michela Cava announced their engagement on social media on Wednesday, adding another entry to the growing list of sapphic professional women’s hockey players popping the question.
“Us forever,” Greco and Cava wrote in a shared Instagram post published on Wednesday afternoon. The accompanying carousel of images featured Cava kneeling on a Hawaiian beach and presenting Greco with a ring, as well as Greco wiping away happy tears after she said yes.
Commenters sent the couple many, many congratulations.
“STOP IT OMG I’M CRYING,” wrote Minnesota Frost player Taylor Fox.
“I’m crying! I’m so obsessed with you two! So happy for you AHHHHH,” wrote Gwyneth Philips, who was a goalie for Team USA at the 2026 Milan Olympics.
Cava and Greco have a long history of playing together, per The Hockey News. They were both recently traded to the Ottawa Charge, which then reached the Walter Cup finals. They first played on the same team in the 2020-2021 season as part of the Toronto Six, which won the Isobel Cup in 2023. Cava and Greco were part of the team that won the inaugural Walter Cup in 2024 as team members of PWHL Minnesota.
Several PWHL players announced their engagements this summer, per The Hockey News, including Toronto Sceptres defenders Allie Munroe and Kali Flanagan, as well as Emily Clark of the PWHL Hamilton and Jaime Bourbonnais of the New York Sirens.
Earlier this year, during the 2026 Olympic Games, American ice hockey captain Hilary Knight proposed to her fiancé speedskater Brittany Bowe after they met at the 2018 Olympic Games in Pyeongchang.
There is also a long tradition of women’s hockey players marrying each other, including rivals from other teams — and even countries, such as American Olympian Julie Chu and Canadian Olympian Caroline Ouellette who first faced off against each other in 2002, but later reconnected and became a couple. Greco and Cava’s teammate Ronja Savolainen is also in an ice hockey couple with Toronto Sceptres player Anna Kjellbin.
This is, of course, not only a phenomenon in the WPHL. With over 25% of women who play in the WNBA identifying as gay, there are quite a few couples in the league, as well, including New York Liberty teammates Natasha Cloud and Isabelle Harrison.
The attempt to turn the WNBA into the site of the next anti-trans culture war is going about as well as you’d expect. The most recent obstacle? They want Caitlin Clark to parrot her Indiana Fever teammate Sophie Cunningham’s transphobic commentary on participation in sports — and Clark won’t do it.
So far, what is easily one of the most progressive and queerest professional sports leagues on the planet has so far largely rejected Cunningham’s recent transformation into the Riley Gaines of women’s basketball. After the Indiana Fever guard told ESPN earlier this month that “young girls in sport… shouldn’t have to go against biological men” — a fairly flagrant transphobic dogwhistle — she has since doubled down on those comments, drawing both protesters and supporters at upcoming games.
But it’s clear where the organic sentiment lies: two courtside pro-Sophie attendees at one Seattle Storm game reportedly had their tickets paid for by a “generous donor,” meanwhile everyone from fans to coaches like Cheryl Reeve are making it clear through signage and T-shirts that the W is not a place for hate.
That hasn’t stopped right-wing commentators from pressuring Clark — herself long wielded by bad-faith actors as a culture war bludgeon to criticize Black queer players — to echo Cunningham’s comments.
Asked at a press conference after Sunday’s Indiana Fever loss against the Minnesota Lynx about Cunningham’s position, Clark took a fairly neutral position, in comments reported by People. “I think it’s for leagues and governing bodies to work with their athletes to find solutions,” Clark said, adding, “Our focus is on basketball. That’s what we talk about and how we can get wins and obviously we didn’t do that tonight. So we need to find an area to improve in that way.”
That, apparently, though, wasn’t good enough for former Fox News host Megyn Kelly, who called Clark “cowardly” in comments reported by Mediaite, going on to falsely claim that “little girls are getting the shit kicked out of them in their sport.”
“[Y]ou are the most famous woman in women’s basketball, and you’re directly asked as the issue rears its head in your sport, and you punt on it,” Kelly added.
But that’s just the tip of the iceberg, as a quick glance through the cesspool that is X will reveal, in posts that aren’t even worth resharing here. Suffice it to say, it’s so nasty that even Dave Portnoy — not exactly an avatar of progressivism — called Kelly an “idiot” for going after Clark.
“1st of all you don’t even know how she feels on this issue and more importantly she doesn’t owe it to you or anybody else to be your political talking point,” Portnoy wrote in a quote-response to Kelly on X. “She just wants to play ball. Total coward cheap shot to call her a coward for not being your puppet.”
Lost in all of this is the fact that there are no transgender women playing basketball in the WNBA and, as of February 2025, are banned from NCAA competition. Which means this is currently a complete non-issue within American professional women’s basketball.
The ire directed at Clark also reveals just how desperate people are to make the player into an avatar for their own worst impulses. But it turns out that some people have more on their minds than just frothing-at-the-mouth transphobia. As The Bulwark’s White House correspondent Andrew Egger wrote on X, “It’s been weird watching for years as right-wing influencers try to draft Caitlin Clark into the culture war and it’s weird today watching them ritually denounce her for not participating. She’s never participated! She wants to shut up and dribble!”
It's been weird watching for years as right-wing influencers try to draft Caitlin Clark into the culture war and it's weird today watching them ritually denounce her for not participating. She's never participated! She wants to shut up and dribble! pic.twitter.com/qSpLK77oRi — Andrew Egger (@EggerDC) August 3, 2026
Can you imagine? Actually caring about playing your sport instead of being a puppet for someone else’s cause cause du jour? Wild!
President Donald Trump (left) attends the men's final on day 15 of the 2025 US Open Tennis Championships at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center on September 7, 2025 in Flushing Meadows, Queens, New York City, and Sophie Cunninham photo from her Instagram account
Photo by Jean Catuffe/GC Images / Sophie Cunningham Instagram
After WNBA player Sophie Cunningam made it clear to reporters where she stands on the issue of transgender athletes — following one paragraph in a nearly 5,000 word profile by ESPN — the floodgates of support poured open, with praise from the president of the United States to everyday Americans who feel as she does: "I want to protect young girls in a locker room, or young girls in sport who shouldn't have to go against biological men.”
Sports and political pundit Stephen A. Smith said Cunningham “is a thousand percent right” on his SiriusXM Radio show Thursday, echoing transphobic talking points about trans athletes and ignoring the scientific evidence about whether trans women and girls have an advantage in sports.
“What if an NBA player decided to transition to playing in the WNBA?” Smith asked. “How elite would they be? How great would they be? We gotta put stuff in its proper perspective and call it like it is.”
Smith also said he supports establishing separate leagues for trans athletes, apparently unaware that something called the Negro League did something similar to Black professional baseball players until finally being disbanded in 1962.
Trump administration press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Washington Post and other reporters at the White House Thursday that President Donald Trump is personally “following” coverage of Cunningham’s remarks and has strong feelings about the issue.
“We want to protect women and girls,” Leavitt said, adding that Cunningham was speaking the “truth” about transgender female athletes. Leavitt was backed up by a post on X from the U.S. Department of Education, adding a crown atop Cunningham's head.
“And the backlash she is receiving from Democrats and left-wing figures across the country is astonishing,” Leavitt added.
She's referring to what Out reported, that Cunningham's transphobic dog-whistles, from loaded words like "protect" to "biological men," drew an immediate backlash from WNBA fans, sports writers, and athletes alike, all speaking out against Cunningham's remarks.
That backlash led a half-dozen reporters to confront the athlete Wednesday before she led the Indiana Fever in a blowout win over the Connecticut Sun.
“I think I said what I said,” Cunningham told the gaggle of reporters. “I think it’s kind of common sense. And I think I’ll always believe in that. I think it’s really important to protect children. And that’s little girls who are also involved in that category. And so I stand on what I said, and I always believe that.”
Cunningham was also asked if she's interested in a career in politics after she hangs up her hoops shoes.
“I don’t know. I’m not a very political person,” she said. “But I do have beliefs. I have morals, and I’ll always stand on those and be true to who I am. And I think people are going to take it how they want to take it, but I’ve never even really said anything about that. And so, when it comes just to protecting young girls in sport and women in sport, I feel very strongly about that. I think that’s why you have Title IX. That’s why you have some of the greats in women’s sports. If Title IX and women’s sports weren’t protected, then you wouldn’t hear about any type of women in sports. And so I think in the future it’s just really important to protect.”
When asked if she has any animus for trans people, Cunningham denied it, and repeated what she told ESPN, that she has "never once said I hated the trans community."
“Like I said, I extend love, and I don’t dislike anyone,” she began. “I think there is room for absolutely everyone here, and I think there’s room to love everyone. I truly think when you get people in the same room, and you have conversations, you actually have a lot in common with a lot of people. And so I’m there to love, but I’m also there to love biological women. And I think that there are rights that need to be protected. And like I said, I’m going to stand true to that. I’ll never falter in my beliefs in that. But I have never once said I hated the trans community. Like I said, I think there’s space for everyone.”
Not surprisingly, former tennis star Martina Navratilova — known for her anti-trans remarks — agreed with Cunningham's remarks and shared it in a post on X with her 480K followers, adding two applause emojis and one fistbump emoji.
And that side of the internet jumped on the bandwagon.
Thanks to the 2026 collective bargaining agreement, which will extend through 2032, players can now earn a one-year supermax salary of $1.4 million with a regular annual max of $1.19 million. These represent percentages of a $7 million team salary cap, which is almost five items higher than the $1.3 million cap under the 2020 CBA. But that’s a lot of numbers to say that the earning power of this predominantly Black and largely queer league is expanding dramatically, along with its popularity among viewers.
Our summer 2026 cover stars, the StudBudz —a viral content creating duo composed of Minnesota Lynx player Courtney Williams and the Seattle Storm’s Natisha Hiedeman— recently opened up about the impact of the new CBA. “It changed my life. My mama, she’s able to retire now,” Williams told Them, with Hiedeman adding, “In the past, [my goals] maybe seemed far-fetched but now it’s like, no I could do that.”
There’s no overstating the impact of this dramatic infusion of wealth into a league that has long dealt with suboptimal travel conditions, low salaries, and a reliance on offseason play overseas to make ends meet. After all, the previous minimum salary for a WNBA player was a mere $66,000. These pay increases have huge ripple effects — on the players and their families, on the philanthropic causes they support, and on the culture writ large.
To paint a picture, Them used data from Her Hoop Stats to compare the salaries of the 20 highest-paid WNBA players in the 2026 season with what they were earning five years ago, in 2021. Some players saw over 2,000% increases in their pay over this time period — and this doesn’t include brand deals and other sponsorship opportunities that can augment a player’s earning potential. One quick note: Shakira Austin’s and Gabby Williams’ current salaries are compared to their 2022 earnings: Austin was not drafted in 2022, and Williams did not play in the 2021 season due to a commitment to the French Olympic women’s basketball team.